Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant was the second floor victim D (V, 21 years old) of the Jung-gu Incheon Central Building C, Incheon Central District, and was the second part of Earba.

A person who became aware of the victim as a customer in the OOPC room.

On November 19, 2017, the Defendant reported that the victim moves out of the toilet in around 19:30, while carrying out the game in the above PC room. On November 19, 2017, the Defendant went out to the female toilet in which the victim went to the victim with the intent to steals the appearance of the victim from the view of the victim, and then went out to the female toilet in which the victim went to the victim.

A person who has occupied a mobile phone in order to steals the form of a victim that is unfriendly in the state of the liquid phone that he/she had been in possession of the victim.

In the next toilet column, the victim was sealed into the room possessed by the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report internal investigation (on-site search and investigation), each investigation report (CCTV investigation, and re-influence of suspects for committing crimes);

1. Article 319 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 319 of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The Defendant’s crime of sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground of the sentencing of the Defendant’s crime of provisional payment order is deemed to have been committed on the part of the victim’s toilet with the intent of larcenying the appearance of the victim, and intrusion of the room room by inserting cell phone into the toilet column where the victim was the victim, and the nature of the crime is very poor in light of the motive and circumstance of the crime.

Since the Defendant violated the victim’s inner space to satisfy his sexual self-defense, it is not easy to criticize the possibility of criticism.

Since the defendant tried to capture the situation of male toilets at the time of initial detection, such as the fact that male toilets were low or that there was no suspension, the circumstances after the crime are not good.

The victim is deemed to have suffered a considerable mental impulse due to the crime of this case as a female.