logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2018.01.26 2017노1587
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주치상)등
Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The sentence of the court below (10 months of imprisonment) against the defendant on the summary of the reasons for appeal is too unreasonable.

2. We examine the judgment of the court below. In the case of each crime set forth in the 2017 Highest 3644 of the decision of the court below, the distance from the hours of driving without a license for drinking, and the risk therefrom is realized and the occurrence of a traffic accident does not occur. The degree of damage caused by a traffic accident set forth in the 2017 Highest 3535 of the judgment of the court below is relatively heavy. The defendant reflects the defendant's intention to commit each of the crimes of this case while committing each of the crimes of this case, and it is relatively clear that social ties relationship is relatively obvious, such as the victim of the traffic accident at the investigation stage, the agreement is reached with the victims of the above traffic accident, the brus and their families want to take

On the other hand, the Defendant, while driving a vehicle not covered by mandatory insurance without obtaining a license for a motor vehicle, caused the driver of the damaged vehicle and the passenger in front of the signal, and damaged the damaged vehicle at the same time. In particular, immediately after the accident, the Defendant escaped from the scene without taking any measures despite the said passenger’s talking that the passenger was pregnant or nursing, and later, committed a crime without obtaining a license for a drinking without a license under Article 3644 of the judgment of the court below. The Defendant committed a crime without a license under Article 2017 higher-class 3644 of the judgment of the court below while he was investigated by the investigative agency due to the above crime. In light of the background of the crime, method of the crime, danger, circumstances after the crime, etc., the degree of alcohol alcohol in the blood while driving the motor vehicle had reached 0.16% at the time of the above drunk, the Defendant already committed a violation of the Road Traffic Act (the traffic accident), and the violation of the Road Traffic Act (the Road Traffic Act).

arrow