The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the reasons for appeal (unfair sentencing) is that the sentence of the lower court (the imprisonment of eight months and the order to complete the course 80 hours) is too unreasonable.

2. Although the judgment of the court below shows the misunderstanding of the defendant and appears to have a somewhat fall intellectual ability, considering the place and form of the instant forced indecent act, etc., in light of the fact that the crime was not committed by the victims so that the nature of the crime would be hot and high, the victim did not obtain a letter of suspicion, even if there was a history of punishment by the same crime, re-offending the crime, and taking into account other factors of sentencing indicated in the records, such as the circumstances of the crime, the circumstances after the crime, the defendant's age, and sexual behavior, it does not seem that the sentence of the court below is too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit.