1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

The court's explanation of this case is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, as well as the modification or addition of the following Paragraph (2). Thus, this case is quoted by Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

Revised or adding part of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be amended from 17th to 20th as follows.

1) In full view of the following circumstances revealed in light of the facts acknowledged earlier, Gap evidence Nos. 4, 7, 9, 16, Eul evidence Nos. 2, 3, and 11 and Eul evidence Nos. 2, 3, and 11 (including branch numbers), Eul’s testimony by the witness of the first instance court, the testimony by the witness of the court of this court on EL Plus Co., Ltd., Ltd., and the fact inquiry reply by the court of this case on February 13, 2015, and the purport of this court’s fact inquiry reply and the whole argument against KSP Co., Ltd. as of January 16, 2015, the plaintiff and C are making a genuine marital life.

The following parts are added to “Witness” of the last sentence of the first instance judgment to “A witness of the first instance trial. The fourth sentence of the first instance judgment cannot be readily concluded.” On the other hand, the Defendant’s employee visited the Plaintiff’s domicile on August 26, 2014 and visited the Plaintiff’s domicile again on the fact-finding survey, and there was clothes and shoes, etc. deemed to be C at the time of the said fact-finding survey, and there appears to have been family photographs of the Plaintiff, C, and ASEAN, and there appears to have been family photographs of the Plaintiff, C, and ASEAN, which appears to be C, and fung in the part of the hand of the brushes.

It is difficult to see that C does not live in the above domicile, even though it does not reside in the above domicile, solely on the circumstance that C had clothes of women or personal care in the future.

The fourth through fifth shall be amended as follows. The fourth through fifth shall be amended as follows. The fourth is the male-friendly G at the time of the investigation into the actual condition of the defendant's applicant's nationality on April 15, 2013.