Defendant

A KRW 7 million, Defendant B is punished by a fine of KRW 10 million, and Defendant C is punished by a fine of KRW 7 million.

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendants’ co-principaled Defendants A worked as the head of the Incheon Draft Bank of Korea of D corporate and financial headquarters in the manner of promoting and selling insurance products by using the pertinent opportunity in the course of conducting compulsory education at work against a corporation, government agency, etc.; and Defendant B was a person in charge of education schedule interference, management, etc. against a corporation, etc. while working as the head of the same center; Defendant B was working as the victim company until March 2016 from the victim company to March 2016; and Defendant C was a person who retired from office as the head of the F of the competition insurance agency; and Defendant C was employed from the victim company to November 2016.

The business of the victim company was carried out in the way of publicity of insurance products and inducement for conclusion of contracts at the place of compulsory education, which is already involved in the business of the victim company, and the schedule other than compulsory education, which is the workplace, is directly connected to the business and profit of the victim company. The above F was about November 2016 to actively introduce and expand the sales method of insurance products through workplace education such as the victim company.

Defendant

A and E, upon being solicited to leave F from Defendant C and Defendant B to resign from F on November 2016, the victim company’s performance from January 1, 2017 at the time of retirement is likely to have not been properly reflected in the wage payment, and the victim company’s departure from employment from January 1, 2017. From December 1, 2016 to December 31, 2016, the victim company violated the duty to properly report the schedule of compulsory education for employees, who are not the parties of the victim company, to the victim company and to treat the schedule of compulsory education for the victim company, and notify the F of the completion of the completion of the work as if some schedule was cancelled or not interfered with from the beginning. Defendant C and Defendant B had expressed their intent to promote insurance products and conclude the contract by using the pertinent schedule of education.

Defendants conspired to act on January 2016.