The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Although the Defendant appealed on the ground that the lower court’s punishment was too unreasonable, the instant crime of violating the Electronic Financial Transactions Act was committed not only undermining the stability and reliability of financial transactions, but also undermining the social harm. As such, the means of access in this case is used for the Bosing phishing crime, and the Defendant committed the act of lending the means of access while promising to receive compensation around March 20, 2018, and committed again the same kind of crime after being prosecuted on September 27, 2018, in light of all the sentencing conditions indicated in the records and arguments, even if considering the Defendant’s health condition and economic circumstances, it is not recognized that the sentence imposed by the lower court, based on the reasons indicated in its reasoning, is too unreasonable.

Since the appeal by the defendant is groundless, it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.