1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. On December 9, 2003, the gist of the Plaintiff’s assertion: (a) the Plaintiff lent KRW 45,00,000 to Defendant B with interest rate of KRW 18% per annum; (b) the overdue interest rate of KRW 20% per annum; and (c) the due date of repayment on December 28, 2004; and (d) the Defendant C jointly and severally guaranteed the above loan obligations of Defendant B; (b) the Defendants are jointly and severally liable to pay the Plaintiff the above loan amount of KRW 45,00,000,00

2. We examine the judgment; Gap evidence Nos. 1, which the plaintiff asserted that he was delivered to the defendant Eul, cannot be used as evidence because there is no evidence to prove the authenticity thereof (with respect to the evidence Nos. 1, the defendant Eul affixed a seal affixed with the ground that he did not have any fact to establish it, denying the authenticity of the stamp Nos. 1, stating that he did not have any fact to affix his seal, and that the name and address of the defendant Eul did not have any fact to have been written. The defendant Eul, without permission from the defendant Eul, stated the name and address of the defendant Eul and affixed the seal Nos. 1 with the defendant Eul affixed the seal Nos. 6, but there was no fact that the name and address of the defendant Eul as stated in the evidence Nos. 1, 1, 2, and 6, and the following facts and circumstances, which are acknowledged by the purport of each of the evidence No. 1, 1, 2, and 1, 201, as well as the following facts that the plaintiff did not have any effect divorce as the plaintiff No. 1, 2, 1, 196.