logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 원주지원 2014.01.15 2013고단743
마약류관리에관한법률위반(향정)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

Seized evidence shall be confiscated in subparagraphs 5 through 7.

20,000 won from the defendant.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. At around 17:00 on October 20, 2013, the Defendant, together with D, received a merpter E 501, which he possessed by D, from D, a merpter (hereinafter referred to as “copon”), and then dilutioned water into a preparatory copon, and then administered once the Defendant’s stuff.

2. At around 17:00 on October 28, 2013, the Defendant, along with D, received a mert flaps (hereinafter referred to as “copon”), which he had been in possession of D, issued a mert flaps (hereinafter referred to as “copon”), and then dilutioned water into a coper that he had prepared, and then injected them once.

Accordingly, the Defendant, in collusion with D, administered psychotropic drugs even if they are not authorized to handle narcotics.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement concerning F;

1. Investigation report (to attach photographs to the results of a simplified reagents examination which is a documentary examiner), and each subsequent report (to replys to requests for electronic appraisal, replys to requests for appraisal of narcotics, details of replys to requests for assessment of narcotics, etc., as a result of maternity

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to each protocol of seizure and each list of seizure;

1. Article 60 (1) 2, Article 4 (1), and subparagraph 3 (b) of Article 2 of the Act on the Management of Narcotics, Etc., and Article 30 of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Confiscation under Article 48 (1) 1 of the Criminal Act, the main sentence of Article 67 of the Narcotics Control Act;

1. On July 4, 2012, the Defendant on the grounds of sentencing under the proviso to Article 67 of the Act on the Management of Narcotics, Etc., was sentenced to two years of imprisonment for a violation of the Game Industry Promotion Act in the main branch of the Chuncheon District Court on July 4, 2012, and was sentenced to two years of suspension of execution on July 12, 2012, and the said judgment became final and conclusive and conclusive on July 12, 2012, and committed the instant crime without being aware of it, the Defendant’s disadvantage, such as the Defendant’s mistake, and the favorable circumstances, such as the Defendant’s age, character

arrow