1. The lawsuit of this case shall be dismissed.

2. The costs of retrial shall be borne by the plaintiff.

purport, purport, and.

1. The following facts are apparent in the records of the judgment subject to a retrial:

On January 1, 1993, the Plaintiff had leased and resided part of C’s house, the father of the Defendant. However, on January 21, 1993, a fire occurred in the above house, and the Plaintiff’s goods were partly destroyed.

B. The Plaintiff filed a lawsuit against C to seek payment of KRW 10 million with compensation, alleging that the Plaintiff sustained damages due to the said fire as the 97 Ghana District Court Decision 97 Ghana264.

On June 13, 1997, C paid to the Plaintiff KRW 500,000,000, and the mediation to waive the remaining claims was concluded.

C died in around 199 in 199, and the defendant is his children.

C. The plaintiff filed a lawsuit against the defendant for damages amounting to 55 million won with this court's 2005da39414, and the conciliation was established on May 3, 2006 against the plaintiff's father who had already filed a lawsuit against the defendant for damages amounting to 55 million won since the plaintiff had already asserted in the lawsuit for damages other than damages caused by the suspension of the above claim, damages caused by the excessive operation of the plaintiff, damages caused by the excessive operation of the plaintiff's property, damages caused by the excessive operation of the plaintiff's property, damages caused by the excessive operation of the lawsuit for compensation, damages caused by the negligence, damages caused by the negligence, damages caused by the negligence, books and teaching materials, and mental damages caused by bad faith, cosmetics, cosmetics, bedclothess, bedclothess, kitchens, kitchens, furnitures, household products, mixed goods, and mental injuries. The plaintiff's remaining damages caused by the judgment in question and the judgment in question were dismissed as it did not conflict with the plaintiff's grounds for rejection.

The plaintiff is therefore entitled.