logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2018.02.08 2017가합22845
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The Defendants jointly share KRW 317,441,303 to Plaintiff A, KRW 5,00,000 to Plaintiff B, and KRW 3,00,000 to Plaintiff C, and the above amount.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. Plaintiff B is the mother of Plaintiff A, and Plaintiff C is the words of Plaintiff A.

B. Defendant E operates the F Company for the purpose of crowdfunding education business, etc. (hereinafter “instant business”), and Defendant D took part in the instant business experience instructor at the instant business.

C. On September 2015, Plaintiff A purchased the right to participate in the crowdfunding discount scheme sold by Defendant E through Internet social money, and on September 26, 2015, Plaintiff A visited the instant company on September 26, 2015.

Plaintiff

A, around September 26, 2015, around 14, 2015, at the F-off area located in G of the wife population G, falling at a height of 6 meters from the first collision between the vehicle and the vehicle crashed into the parking lot floor.

(hereinafter “instant accident”). E.

Due to the accident in this case, the plaintiff A suffered injuries, such as external wound ples and other open wound of head.

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1 to 5, Eul evidence 1 to 6, Eul evidence 1 to 6, Eul's evidence 1 to 6 (including each number), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Defendant D’s assertion of the Plaintiffs is a parogle trading instructor, and the Plaintiff should safely operate the parogle so that the Plaintiff can safely fly the experience flight. Even if a storm or sloping occurred, Defendant D was in breach of his duty of care to prevent the Plaintiff from an accident through the sloping of assistance, etc. and suffered injury, and thus, Defendant D is liable to compensate for damages caused by tort pursuant to Article 750 of the Civil Act.

Defendant E is the employer of Defendant D, and is liable for employer under Article 756 of the Civil Act, and is the joint tortfeasor under Article 760 of the Civil Act and the performance assistant under Article 391 of the Civil Act, and is jointly and severally liable with Defendant D to compensate the Plaintiffs for the damages.

3. Determination

A. The occurrence of the liability for damages 1 Defendant D-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-

arrow