logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2016.08.09 2016고합132
무고등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant was elected as the president of the Dong E Housing Redevelopment Partnership during the period of Ansan-si around February 2011, and F is related to the above partnership's rearrangement business.

In a lawsuit for invalidation of an election of the president of an association brought by a member opposing the Defendant, the Defendant was sentenced to a judgment of invalidation of election on the ground that the quorum was insufficient at the time of election of the president of the association.

G was elected as the president of the new association on April 28, 2012.

The Defendant embezzled union expenses at the time when G was in office as a general manager of the foregoing union.

On May 8, 2012, after an emergency response committee was organized and appointed as a representative, a complaint was filed with the affiliated branch office of the Suwon District Public Prosecutor's Office on the ground of occupational embezzlement, and the above complaint case was investigated by the police station during the period of learning under the prosecutor's direction, and was sent to the affiliated branch office on July 5, 2012.

On August 7, 2012, the instant case was disposed of without suspicion due to occupational embezzlement by the branch office in the public prosecutor's office in the Suwon District Public Prosecutor's Office (K) on August 7, 2012. After the complainant filed a complaint on August 10, 2012, but on August 29, 2012, the public prosecutor's office in Seoul High Public Prosecutor's Office dismissed the reappeal. On October 5, 2012, the reappeal filed a reappeal on October 26, 2012, but the instant reappeal was dismissed by the Supreme Public Prosecutor's Office in the Supreme Public Prosecutor's Office on November 26, 2012, the Defendant was in a position to be elected as the head of the partnership if G is indicted, and the F was elected as the head of the partnership and could take profits by entrusting the improvement project of the partnership.

On July 8, 2012, the Defendant was transferred KRW 500,000 to the Agricultural Cooperative Account in the name of the Defendant, for the purpose of soliciting the prosecutor from F on July 10, 2012, at the office of the Emergency Countermeasure Committee of the Association located in Ansan-si, and “F would make it possible for the Defendant to prosecute a case of accusation which was sent to the Prosecutor General of the Seoul Central Prosecutor’s Office of the Branch of the Seoul Central Prosecutor’s Office in favor of his wife to the prosecution, in favor of the Prosecutor.”

In this respect.

arrow