A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

Seized evidence 2 shall be confiscated.

9,800,000 won shall be additionally collected from the defendant.

Punishment of the crime

On November 16, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment for one year with labor for a violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, etc. in the support of the Daejeon District Court, and the judgment became final and conclusive on November 24, 2017.

Even if the Defendant is not a narcotics handler, the Defendant treated the Metropha, which is a local mental medicine (hereinafter referred to as “philophone”), as follows:

The Defendant decided to purchase writingphones from E, and the payment method was made by delivering cash cards connected to the one bank account (G) in the name of Defendant F, Defendant’s wife, to E and, if the Defendant deposits the price into the said account, E decides to withdraw it.

On March 16, 2016, the Defendant purchased KRW 300,000 from E, and remitted KRW 1,30,000 to one bank account in the above F name. On the same day, the Defendant purchased phiphones by being delivered 2.5g of bus freight from I in the Y in the astronomical City of Boan-si on the same day.

In addition, from this point to July 22, 2016, the Defendant purchased approximately KRW 21g 9.8 million from E to 8 times in total, such as the list of crimes in the attached list of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by each prosecutor to E;

1. Details of transactions of accounts of the Saemaul Treasury, and details of transactions of accounts of the Han Bank;

1. Each protocol of seizure;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: A criminal investigation report (Attachment of a narcotic case for a suspect's astronomical support to him/her), text of judgment (the Daejeon District Court's 2017 High Court's 207 High Court's 2073 High Court's 2073 High Court'

1. Article 60 (1) 2, Article 4 (1) 1, and subparagraph 3 (b) of Article 2 of the Act on the Management of Narcotics, Etc., for the sake of facts constituting an offense, and Articles 60 (1) 3, and 4 (1) 3 (b) of the same Act, applicable to the choice of

1. Article 37 of the Criminal Act for the treatment of concurrent crimes: Provided, That Article 39 (1) shall apply;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. The main sentence of Article 67 of the Act on the Management of Confiscated Narcotics;

1. The number of reasons for sentencing in the proviso of Article 67 of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, Etc. is the case where the defendant purchased the penphone.