Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
"2016 Highest 2522"
1. On October 15, 2016, the Defendant: (a) stolen one out of the air conditioners, other than the air conditioners, set up on the road in front of the Sung-gun, Sung-gun, Sung-gun, Sung-gun, Gyeong-gun, the Defendant: (b) loaded one ton of the cargo vehicles D1 ton, which the victim C left on the road.
2. The Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (unlicensed Driving) drive D1 ton of freight at approximately 200 meters away from the road front of the above X X Aart Do road on the roads located in the Sung-dong, Sung-dong, Sung-gun, Sung-gun, Sung-gun, Sung-gun, Sung-gun, Sung-do without a driver's license for the same day.
"2017 Highest 663"
3. The Defendant, at the Daegu District Court on October 9, 2007, received a fine of KRW 3 million due to a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving), a fine of KRW 4 million due to a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving), at the branch court of the Daegu District Court on June 19, 2007, and at the branch court of the Daegu District Court on June 2, 201, 10 months from imprisonment due to a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving), and at the branch court of the Daegu District Court on June 2, 201, 5 million from a fine of KRW 1 million due to a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving), respectively.
On December 15, 2016, the Defendant driving a DNA cargo vehicle with alcohol content of 0.097% in the blood without a driver's license on December 15, 2016, while driving a DNA cargo vehicle with alcohol content of 0.097% in the blood, and led to the intersection of the Gyeongsung-gun E in front of the Gyeongsung-gun from the opposite side of the Sungju elementary school.
Since there is an intersection that is not supported by traffic control, the driver of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to check whether there is a vehicle crossing by reducing speed or temporarily stopping and driving safely.
Nevertheless, the Defendant did not discover the G SP car driving by the victim F.(38 Do) who was under the influence of alcohol and was under the left-hand turn to the sP car from the cafeteria at the scopic elementary school on the scopic negligence. The part on the left-hand side of the freight driven by the Defendant is behind the left-hand side of the scopic car.