Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.
However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
When the defendant was aware of the fact that he was about to escape from detention by introducing "E under investigation by the prosecution as an illegal game site unemployment owner in the Daegu-gun," through "E, who is a person working as the head of the office of the Seocho-gu Seoul Law Firm, on October 2015, the first police officer of Seocho-gu, and "E who is under investigation by the prosecution, as the head of the illegal game site in the Daegu-gun," around October 5, 2015, the defendant was able to take a phone call from Seocho-gu Seoul on October 5, 2015, and the prosecutor in charge is 31.
If the Deputy Prosecutor General, the chief of the department, the prosecutor in charge and the person in charge of the prosecutor's friendly relationship enter the subordinate branch office, and they can easily be investigated at the stage of the prosecutor's office, which leads to a difference in 50 million won.
“To know” from E and upon request.
I would like to offer money from detention.
First of all, the consent was obtained from Daegu.
Accordingly, on October 6, 2015, the Defendant met the victim at the coffee shop located in Daegu-gu Daegu-dong around 11:40 on October 6, 2015, and “I am friendly with the Prosecutor General, I am friendly with the Prosecutor of the Department, and I am friendly with the Prosecutor of the Department, and even if I know about the investigation, I am able not to be detained by the Prosecutor.
First of all, although the defendant made a false statement "(50 million won)", the defendant did not consult with the person related to the prosecution with regard to the investigation of the victim's non-detention, there was no ground that it is possible to investigate the victim's non-detention, and if the injured party "(50 million won) is able to prepare the amount, but the party's body did not enter the prosecutor's office, and the party's body did not see that the party's body did not change
Along with the rejection of “no money can be given first without any clearness,” the case was hedging.
The Defendant, immediately after receiving KRW 50 million from the injured party, refers to the Defendant, around 14:27 of the same day and around 14:37 of the same day, to the victim, who was in the vicinity of the shuttle bus terminal in Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, Seoul-gu, Seoul-gu, that “The ESN was under a definite answer that the attorney inspected and investigated.”