1. The Defendant indicated in the attached Form 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, on the ground of 132 square meters in Jeonbuk-gun, Jeonbuk-gun, and 223 square meters in D, Jeonbuk-gun.

1. Determination as to the cause of claim

(a) The following facts are recognized by comprehensively taking account of the descriptions and images of Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 2 (including paper numbers) and the purport of the entire pleadings as a result of a request for appraisal by the Korea Land Information Corporation for the main branch office of this Court:

1) The Plaintiff is entitled to “instant land” on the land of the said three lots of land, namely, 132 square meters in Jeon-gun, Jeonbuk-gun, Jeonbuk-gun, E, 531 square meters in size, and D 223 square meters in size (hereinafter “instant land

(2) The Defendant is the owner of the instant land. (2) The Defendant is using 17 square meters inside a ship, which connects each point of 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 19, and 55 square meters of the instant land, and of 1,2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 17 square meters of the instant land, each of which is indicated in the annexed drawings on the ground of 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, and 13 square meters of land in sequence, which are linked to each point of 1,2, 3, 4, 6, 7, and 1 of the attached drawings on the ground of 223 square meters in Jeon-gun-gun, North Korean-gun

B. According to the facts of the above recognition, the Defendant is obligated to remove, in sequence, each of the items indicated in the drawings attached to the 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, and 9 on the ground of 132 square meters in Jeon-gun, Jeonju-gun, Jeonju-gun, and 223 square meters in D, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 17, 15, 50 square meters in the ship, and 55 square meters in the cement area, 55 square meters in the cement section, 55 square meters in the cement section, 55 square meters in the land of this case and 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8, and 17 square meters in the land of this case, to deliver the land of this case.

2. Judgment on the defendant's assertion

A. The summary of the Defendant’s assertion is that the former owner of the instant land is entitled to occupy the instant land when he/she pays the purchase price for the part of the instant land to the former owner and occupies it.

B. We examine whether the Defendant paid the purchase price for the part of the instant land to the pre-owner, and there is no evidence to acknowledge this.

Even if the Defendant paid the purchase price for a part of the instant land to the pre-owner.