logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 군산지원 2015.04.01 2014고단1247
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor of 10 months and fines of 3,00,000 won, and Defendant B shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor of 6 months.

Defendant

A above.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is a person who operates a commercial sex trafficking business with the trade name "F" on the e and 2th floor in the Jeonbuk-si, the Ma, and the defendant B is an employee working in the carter of the said commercial sex trafficking business establishment.

At around 03:00 on August 6, 2014, the Defendants conspired to arrange commercial sex acts three times per day from November 7, 2013 to August 6, 2014 by receiving 140,000 won from his/her name-free customers and allowing employees to provide commercial sex acts once with the said customers, and engaging in commercial sex acts by paying 80,000 won to the said women out of 140,000 won, and taking the remainder of 60,000 won.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to arrange sexual traffic for business purposes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. A protocol of suspect examination of G police officers;

1. Police seizure records;

1. Application of each statute on photographs;

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic concerning facts constituting an offense, Article 30 of the Criminal Act;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor and the concurrent imposition of fines (Article 24 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic) against Defendant A of the option of punishment and imprisonment with prison labor against Defendant B

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for detention in a workhouse (Defendant A);

1. Suspension of execution (the defendants A): Article 62(1) and (2) of the Criminal Act (the extent of participation), such as the fact that there is no criminal history of the same kind of crime, the fact that there is a family member to support (the degree of participation), the fact that there is a family member to support);

1. Confiscation (Defendant A) Article 48 (1) 1 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act (Defendant A);

arrow