beta
Text
1. The judgment of the court of first instance is modified as follows.
The defendant shall make 1/2. of each land listed in the attached list to the plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The plaintiff is a member of a clan consisting of descendants of "C", and the defendant is an organization whose spouse E of "D," who is a three-year-old grandchild of "C," and whose family members are the same as D's family members.
B. Article 16 subparag. 2 of the Rules provides that “The matters concerning the acquisition and disposal of the property owned by the plaintiff” of the board of directors shall be resolved with the attendance of at least 20 persons with respect to the intention of the board of directors, and shall be resolved with the consent of a majority of the number of persons present (Article
(Article 17(4)(c).
On October 10, 1917, the 19th 5th 5th Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Ma (hereinafter “H-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-
After that, on May 20, 1970 with respect to forest land before its division, registration of preservation of ownership in the name of "A" was completed in accordance with the Act on Special Measures for the Registration, etc. of Ownership of Forest Land (amended by Act No. 2111 of May 21, 1969). Each of the instant land is divided into forest land before its division.
However, on March 8, 2006, the registration of correction or correction of the indication of the registration titleholder was completed to correct the registration number of the registration titleholder due to the error in application on March 8, 2006, and on September 22, 2006, the registration of correction or correction of the indication of the registration titleholder was completed.
(hereinafter referred to as the “registration of each correction of this case”).
The Plaintiff and NFC are the Plaintiff, and each of the instant lands is owned by the Plaintiff, and even if not, the Plaintiff and NFE claim that the land of this case is the land owned by NFC for E’s sywing intent, and the Plaintiff is the Plaintiff as the primary Plaintiff and NFC as the preliminary Plaintiff.