1. The Defendant’s Jeonju District Court Decision 2012Kao-4, 2014Kao-18, and Jeonju District Court in relation to Nonparty C.

1. According to the judgment and decision of the Jeonju District Court, Kim Jong-si Court, 2012Kao18, Jeonju District Court, Kim Jong-si court, 2011Gao124, 2014Kao16, which held that the defendant executed the seizure of corporeal movables on December 4, 2014 (hereinafter the above movables and seizure enforcement, hereinafter the above movables and seizure enforcement) on the movables listed in the attached list in Kim Jong-si, Kim Jong-si (hereinafter the above movables and seizure execution), although the movables were originally owned by C, the movables were first owned by C, but the movables were auction proceedings (the Jeonju District Court, 2007Da3480), which were conducted on December 18, 207, the plaintiff, who was the wife of the Jeonju District Court, paid the highest notice to the plaintiff, and had no dispute over the above movables's sale price or the right to acquire the ownership of each of the above movables as a whole between the plaintiff and the above parties.

Thus, the movable property of this case is owned by the plaintiff, and therefore, the compulsory execution of this case based on the premise that the above movable is owned by the above C is illegal, so it shall be dismissed.

2. citing the Plaintiff’s claim for conclusion