1. The plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff-A’s ownership of the 5m2 in Gwangju-si, Gyeonggi-do, and the F field of 9m2 in Gwangju-si is the Plaintiff-B.

B. The G land and buildings listed in the attached Table 1 of the G and the above ground of Gyeonggi-do are owned by Defendant C, and the buildings listed in the attached Table 2 of the Gyeonggi-do City H, I land and above ground are owned by Defendant D.

[Reasons for Recognition] Each entry of Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 4

2. The plaintiffs asserted and determined that the buildings listed in the separate sheet No. 1 attached to the defendant C owned by the defendant are 5 square meters connected each point of the annexed sheet No. 1, 2, 3, 4, and 1 among the annexed sheet No. 5 square meters in Gwangju-si, Gyeonggi-do, the plaintiff owned by the defendant Eul, and that the buildings listed in the annexed sheet No. 2 attached to the defendant Eul owned by the defendant Eul are 9 square meters in line with the annexed sheet No. 2 drawings No. 5, 6, 7, 8, and 5 square meters in line with each point of the annexed sheet No. 2 drawings No. 5, 6, 7, 8, and 5 square meters in Gyeonggi-do. Thus, the defendants asserted that the above illegal buildings should be removed and the land

However, each statement of Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 12 (including paper numbers) is not sufficient to recognize it, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it. Thus, the plaintiffs' assertion is without merit without examining the remaining points.

3. The plaintiffs' claim for conclusion is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.