The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence imposed by the lower court (two years of imprisonment) on the gist of the grounds of appeal is too unreasonable.

2. Although the Defendant had already agreed with the victim at the lower court, it is recognized that there was a favorable sentencing factor, such as the fact that the Defendant provided a considerable amount to the victim again after the pronouncement of the lower judgment, and that the Defendant recognized all crimes in the first instance trial.

However, in the case of each of the crimes of this case and the crimes of intimidation and intimidation, the defendant committed serious bodily harm, such as the victim's act (26 years of age and women)'s face, and the victim's face, 10 minutes of her face, hair, etc., which were taken by the victim so that he/she can invalid home to protect E, as well as the victim's serious injury, such as the victim's satisfying, and the satisfying of satisfy, and the satfying of satfy, etc., and then, the victim satfy, satfy, and satfy, satfy, and satfy, and satfy, and the defendant did not unilaterally harm the victim's satfy to the extent that he/she did not unilaterally leave his/her place of work and move his/her residence to the extent that he/she did not suffer from serious mental harm.