Defendant

In addition, all appeals filed by the medical care and custody requester are dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. In fact, at the time of the instant case, the victim entered the house of the Defendant and the person in charge of the treatment and custody (hereinafter “Defendant”), and returned to the mind of the Defendant, knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife, and the victim knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife

Therefore, the court below which recognized the different facts is erroneous in the misconception of facts.

B. The sentence sentenced by the court below to the defendant (one year of imprisonment, etc.) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. The part 1 of the case against the Defendant’s assertion of mistake of fact is as follows, which can be recognized by the lower court and the trial court’s duly adopted and investigated evidence, i.e., ① the Defendant was investigated by the police at the time of the instant crime, and the Defendant was her residence with tearing and 2 knife knife knife at the time of the instant crime.

A person, due to his neglect, has entered the room of the escape victim, and the defendant was found to have taken the left side of the defendant's own due to his intention to restrain the defendant.

The statement "(Evidence No. 17-18 pages), 2. The photograph of the injured body (Evidence No. 13 pages) and the diagnosis document (Evidence No. 68 pages) corresponding to the fact that the victim suffered a wound due to the Defendant's above act as stated in the facts of the crime at the time of original adjudication, as stated in the facts of the crime, were submitted, and 3. The victim, in the court of the trial at the time of this case, entered the Defendant's house-proof net into the attachment of the body.

At the time, the defendant saw the knife as two knife.

In the process of fighting with the defendant's body, the defendant was at his own price and was at the top of tear.

“....”