1. The defendant,

A. The Plaintiff A’s KRW 34,33,441 and its related KRW 5% per annum from July 1, 2014 to July 14, 2014.

Comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of the arguments in Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 3, Plaintiff A was employed by and retired from office in the defendant company from January 2, 2012 to June 30, 2014; Plaintiff B from July 16, 2011 to July 10, 2014; and Plaintiff C from December 1, 2013 to June 30, 2014; however, Plaintiff A retired from office; Plaintiff A was 34,33,441 (=retirement pay of KRW 25,839,460) (= pay of KRW 25,839,460), and Plaintiff B was 28,432,442 won (= wage of KRW 20,619,050, KRW 7,813,329), and Plaintiff C was 101,075,010.

Therefore, the defendant is obligated to pay to the plaintiff A, the amount of KRW 34,33,41, the amount of KRW 10,735,010, the amount of KRW 14,010 from July 1, 2014 to July 14, 2014, the amount of KRW 5% per annum prescribed by the Civil Act, and the amount of delay damages at the rate of KRW 20% per annum prescribed by the Labor Standards Act from the next day to the date of full payment, and the amount of delay damages at the rate of KRW 28,432,442 from July 11, 2014, which is the next day of retirement, to the plaintiff B, KRW 5% per annum prescribed by the Civil Act until July 24, 2014, and the amount of delay damages at the rate of 20% per annum prescribed by the Labor Standards Act from the next day to the date of full payment.

If so, the plaintiffs' claims are justified and all of them are accepted. It is so decided as per Disposition.