The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The gist of the grounds for appeal is as follows: (a) the Defendant only gets a victim to whom he/she was injured while making a verbal dispute with the victim, and only gets the victim at a parking lot, and there was no injury as to the victim as alleged in the facts charged.

2. In light of the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below, it is reasonable to find the fact-finding and judgment of the court below that the defendant suffered injury on the part of the hospital on the day of January 13, 2012, and that the victim was issued with a written diagnosis of injury, the victim was consistently informed from the investigation agency that he was faced with the defendant, and the statement in investigation agency and court of the court below at E and D conforms to the victim's statement in important parts, and the defendant was not located in the location of the case. However, in light of D's statement and statement attitude, it is argued that D was not located in the location of the case. However, in light of D's statement and statement that D showed the victim at the time of the case, the defendant showed a face at the time of the case, and that there was a fact between the victim and the parking lot, the fact-finding and judgment of the court below are justified, and it is not possible to find any illegality in the judgment of the court below.

Therefore, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.