1. The Plaintiff’s notary public against the Defendant is based on the notarial deed No. 86 of February 23, 2018, 2018.

1. Indication of claim: The monetary loan contract entered into between the plaintiff and the defendant in relation to the authentic deed described in the Disposition Paragraph (1) is null and void in violation of Article 10(1) of the Act on the Punishment, etc. of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic and other social order. The money provided by the defendant to the plaintiff constitutes illegal consideration

Therefore, the Plaintiff’s debt to the Defendant does not exist, and since the mortgage established on the motor vehicle listed in the separate sheet for securing the above debt is null and void, the Plaintiff’s claim for the confirmation of the existence of the debt and the cancellation of the registration of mortgage creation.

2. Judgment without holding any pleadings: Articles 208 (3) 1 and 257 of the Civil Procedure Act.