A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Punishment of the crime

On July 28, 2016, at around 17:25, the Defendant heard the horses to the effect that one person, while working on the road in front of the D C, under the influence of alcohol, takes fright next to the victim E (the age of 33) while enjoying fright on the road in front of the D C, and he saw the victim's fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright.

Accordingly, the defendant assaulted the victim E, and interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of the 112 reported case.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of each police protocol to E, G, and H

1. Articles 136 (1) and 260 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting the crime;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. From among concurrent offenders, there was a record of being fined several times as a crime of breathous violence on the grounds of sentencing under the former part of Article 37, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act. In particular, on November 5, 2015, the crime of this case committed under the influence of alcohol without being aware of the fact that he/she was under probation after being sentenced to one year of probation on June due to a special crime of causing damage and damage, thereby committing the crime of this case. Therefore, the same sentence as