logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.04.26 2016고단1594
무고
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On January 1, 2016, the Defendant, at the lower court’s office near the Seoul Northern District Court located in Dobong-gu Seoul, Seoul Northern District Court, requested a person without his/her name to make a statement that “I would like to make him/her take a bribe of KRW 4,292,584,690,000 to the attorney-at-law of his/her representative and dismiss the bribe of KRW 4,292,584,690,00” and received it by mail at the office of B and the vice president’s office on February 1, 2016, and the said documents were transferred to the Seoul District Prosecutors’ Office on February 26, 2016 through the Supreme Prosecutors’ Office.

However, the prosecutor C did not receive money from the above E or D for the reason that the defendant's genuine F case is unclear and specific facts are not stated.

Accordingly, the defendant reported false facts to public offices for the purpose of having public prosecutor C receive criminal punishment or disciplinary action.

2. On February 2016, the Defendant, at the office near the Seoul Northern District Court, issued a statement to the effect that “The head of the Suwon Veterans Office, the head of the Suwon Veterans Office, and the head of the Dong-gu Government Veterans Office (the head of the Dong-won Veterans Office and the head of the Dong-won Veterans Office in Seoul; hereinafter referred to as the “head of the Dong-won Veterans Office” and the “head of the Gu-won Veterans Branch Office”) received a bribe from G and designated G as the senior bereaved family of H as an independent person of distinguished service,” and received it by mail to the Seoul District Public Prosecutor’s Office on February 29, 2016.

However, in fact, the defendant is not in a relationship with H, who is an independent person of distinguished service, and G was designated as a senior bereaved family of H on July 9, 2009 by G under the Act on the Honorable Treatment of Persons of Distinguished Service to Independence, and there was no fact that the head of the Suwon Veterans Branch Office or the head of the Suwon Veterans Branch Office or the head of the Government Veterans Branch Office has received money from G.

This is the defendant.

arrow