Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
The National Housing Fund's structure of the fraudulent act of lending money to false workers is operating the system of lending money to workers who lend money to the National Housing Fund at a rate lower than that of the time when applying for a loan with only certain documents such as a certificate of employment, detailed statement of salary, etc. and a charter contract without any special security to stabilize the residence of homeless workers with the financial resources of the National Housing Fund.
그러나 근로자 주택 전세자금 대출 관련 업무를 위탁 받은 금융기관이 형식적인 심사만 하고 대출을 해 준다는 사실을 알고, 대출 브로커들은 허위로 임차인과 임대인 역할을 하는 사람들과 함께 근로자 주택 전세자금 대출금을 가로챌 것을 모의하였다.
Accordingly, loan broscers held false employment-related documents and false details related to the lessee as a person holding the name of the lending, and held false documents to the lessee who will perform the lease. The false lessee, as above, submitted documents related to the falsely prepared employment and the written contract for the lease of the house to the financial institution, and applied for the lease of the house to the employee while applying for the loan of the lease of the house to the financial institution. If the request for confirmation of the actual existence of the lease of the house enters into the financial institution, the lessor, who is obligated to perform the lease of the house, applied for the lease of the house of the employee and received the loan of the house of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the house
Specific criminal facts
1. On February 4, 2015, the Defendant committed the crime: (a) false lessee’s interference with the Defendant; (b) false lessee; (c) false lessor; (d) false lessor; (c) false lessor’s interference with the loan; and (c) F was the total responsibility for committing fraud in connection with the loan of the former loan; (d) the Defendant, along with the foregoing F, obtained a loan of the employee deposit money by the means as above; and (e) conspired to divide it in sequence.
As above, the above public offering.