1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the plaintiff A corresponding to the amount ordered to be paid below shall be revoked.

1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation as to this part of the liability for damages is that the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance is identical to that of the judgment, except for the following modifications. Therefore, this Court’s explanation is acceptable in accordance with Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

C. The defendant asserts that the defendant should limit the defendant's liability in consideration of this point, since the plaintiff Gap's error of crossing the crosswalk without examining around it.

However, according to the above macroscopic evidence, the plaintiff A conflicts with the defendant A's vehicle who violated the signal at a point crossing the crosswalk of the eight-lane road crossing according to the pedestrian signal at the crossing of the two-lane opposite road, and the occurrence of the accident in this case and the expansion of damages shall not be deemed to have any error with the plaintiff A.

Therefore, the defendant's above assertion is not accepted.

2. In addition to the matters stated below within the scope of liability for damages, each corresponding item of the Schedule of Calculation of Compensation for Damages shall be as follows, and in principle, the period for the convenience of calculation shall be calculated on a monthly basis, but less than the last month and less than KRW 1 shall be discarded.

The calculation of the current value at the time of the accident shall be based on the reduction rate of 5/12 percent per month to deduct the interim interest.

In addition, it is rejected that the parties' arguments are not stated separately.

Personal information 1) Personal data: as stated in the “basic matters” list of damages calculation sheet: (ii) income and operating period: urban daily wage of ordinary people, 3) residual disability and labor ability loss rate of ordinary people until he reaches the age of 19 through 60): 27% due to the structural transformation due to the structural fluence caused by the structural fluence, including the left-hand minister, 27% due to the structural fluence, permanent disability [2-2) of the Clobrodal disability assessment table, 5) and occupational coefficient 5] of the defendant due to the fluence of the minister.