1. The instant lawsuit shall be dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. The Plaintiff’s assertion was made with a seal affixed to the Defendant on August 2015, the documents that transfer ownership on the ground of donation with respect to the land of 2668 square meters (hereinafter “instant real estate”) prior to Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-do (hereinafter “instant real estate”), while the Plaintiff’s ability to become aware of and sign language due to brain color, fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral

2. Determination on the legitimacy of a lawsuit

A. The Defendant’s defense prior to the merits does not have the ability to delegate a lawsuit to the Plaintiff’s attorney based on the Plaintiff’s genuine intent. Thus, the instant lawsuit is unlawful, since it was not filed by a lawful attorney.

B. According to the evidence evidence No. 2, the Plaintiff appears to be in a situation where dialogue is impossible due to letter, brain color, dementia, recognition degradation, and satisfafafafafafafafafafafafafafafafafafafafafafa, etc., and whether the Plaintiff was directly aware of the meaning of the instant lawsuit and the court, and whether the Plaintiff’s attorney was delegated a lawsuit to the Plaintiff’s attorney, and as a result, it is difficult to understand the meaning of the instant lawsuit, or to deem that the Plaintiff’s attorney had the ability to delegate the lawsuit to the Plaintiff’s attorney from March 2015. Thus, the delegation

3. According to the conclusion, the instant lawsuit is unlawful and dismissed as it was instituted by an unlawful attorney.