Text
1. The part against the defendant among the judgment of the court of first instance is revoked, and the plaintiffs' claim corresponding to the above revoked part is filed.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. Plaintiff A related to the parties is the mother of the deceased E (hereinafter “the deceased”). Plaintiff B is the father of the deceased, Plaintiff C is the arsen of the deceased, and Plaintiff D is the mother of the deceased.
B. On October 17, 1990, the Deceased’s Deceased joined the Navy and transferred on February 4, 1991 to F and on decks, and transferred on decks, and on April 2, 1991, the deceased transferred to the 2nd war reserve G (hereinafter “instant unit”).
At around 13:50 on April 6, 1991, the Deceased died by putting the sprinks on the sprinks of trees in the field of wild sprink around the helicopter of this case and by sprinking them.
C. On May 13, 1991, the 2nd military police officer of the Navy who investigated the deceased's death (i.e., the second military police officer of the Navy who investigated the deceased's death) was presumed to have committed suicide by sparing the parent's sexual intercourse against his/her parent's sexual intercourse and the controlled military life, and concluded that there was no issue of irregularities, such as the act of alphism against the deceased, or any matter of personal management of the transferred person's disease.
B. On September 27, 1991, around January 6, 1999, and around February 9, 1999, Plaintiff A filed a civil petition to the Minister of National Defense and the Chief of Staff of the Navy to re-examine the cause of the death of the deceased. The Ministry of National Defense and the Navy sent a reply to the effect that it is the same as the result of the first investigation by the Military Police Team around November 1, 1991 and October 2001.
Plaintiff
around September 24, 2001, Plaintiff A applied for the first registration of bereaved family members of a person who has rendered distinguished services to the State, but the head of Msan veterans branch rendered a decision on non-specific eligibility as bereaved family members of a person who has rendered distinguished services to the State on the ground that “the deceased died due to self-injury” according to the deliberation and resolution of the Merit Reward Judgment Committee on May 8, 2002.
Shebly, the plaintiff A shall be a bereaved family member of a person of distinguished service to the State with the Changwon District Court 2002Guhap2121 against the head of Musan Military Branch.