logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.02.15 2014가합558658
공사대금
Text

1. As to KRW 431,521,503 and KRW 375,148,554 among the Plaintiff, the Defendant shall start from October 19, 2016 to February 15, 2017.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. 1) On May 31, 2008, the Plaintiff entered into a landscaped construction contract B (hereinafter “instant building”) located in Sacheon-si from the Defendant.

2) The landscaping project (hereinafter “instant landscaping project”)

2) From June 2008 to October 201, 2010, the construction period was set at KRW 4,820,000 (excluding value-added tax) and was awarded a contract. 2) The Plaintiff and the Defendant concluded or modified the instant landscaping project and the instant additional construction contract as follows.

계약체결(변경)일 공사명 공사기간 공사대금 (부가가치세 별도, 원) 2010. 10. 이 사건 조경공사 계약 변경 2008. 6. ~ 2011. 3. 5,440,000,000 2011. 3. 이 사건 조경공사 계약 변경 2008. 6. ~ 2011. 5. 공사대금 변동 없음 2011. 8. 24. 이 사건 건물 조경보완공사 2011. 8. 24. ~ 2011. 9. 23. 400,000,000 2011. 11. 9. 이 사건 건물 조경추가공사 2011. 11. 9. ~ 2011. 11. 28. 108,000,000 2011. 11. 2. 이 사건 건물 챌린지파크 팬스공사 2011. 11. 2. ~ 2011. 12. 1. 22,362,130 2011. 11. 15. 이 사건 건물 조경보완공사 2011. 11. 15. ~ 2011. 12. 20. 55,345,000 합계 6,025,707,130

B. On August 30, 201, the Defendant is obliged to construct night lighting facilities construction works for sports facilities in B on August 30, 201 (hereinafter “ night lighting facilities construction”).

[1] Mescopic acid Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “scopic acid”)

A) A contract was awarded to 286,000,000 won for construction work, but the contract was concluded under the Plaintiff’s name with the Plaintiff’s consent due to the Defendant’s internal circumstances. (ii) The Plaintiff paid 286,00,000 won to sscarco acid in total.

C. The completion of the instant landscaping project and the night lighting facility project was completed on December 20, 201.

The Defendant paid the construction cost to the Plaintiff KRW 6,025,707,130.

E. The Intervenor’s seizure and collection 1) The Intervenor guaranteed the Plaintiff’s loan from the Gyeongnam Bank (the rate of delay damages for reimbursement 12% per annum and the credit guarantee accident.

arrow