1. The Defendants jointly and severally agreed to the Plaintiff A, KRW 11,246,048, and KRW 2,00,000 to the Plaintiff B, and KRW 3,725,403 to the Plaintiff C, respectively.

1. The ground for recognition of the liability for damages, the fact that there has not been any dispute, the entries and images of Gap's 1 through 3, Gap's 5, 6, and Gap's 10 (including branch numbers for those with serial numbers), and the purport of the whole pleadings;

A. 1) The grounds for responsibility lies on Plaintiff A’s female born. Plaintiff B and C are the parents of Plaintiff A, Defendant D is the president of the Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City H Child Care Center, Defendant E is the head of the above fish house, and Defendant E is the mutual aid association that entered into a mutual aid agreement for compensation for damages for accidents, etc. occurred in H child care centers between Defendant D and the special corporation for the purpose of preventing accidents in child care facilities. Defendant E is the mutual aid association that entered into a mutual aid agreement with Defendant D for compensation for damages arising in H child care centers. Defendant E 2) around 10:00 on February 24, 2014 and continued to put the smartphone into the above H child care center and continued to put it into the top of Plaintiff A’s wife and Plaintiff A’s wife while operating the smartphone, making it over to Plaintiff A, thereby purchasing the Plaintiff’s selling to Plaintiff 2.

(hereinafter referred to as “instant accident”). B.

According to the facts of recognition of responsibility, Defendant E is obligated to compensate for damages arising from the occurrence of the instant accident, because Defendant E, as a child-care center teacher, has a duty to safely protect and supervise children and to protect their body as a child-care center teacher, by putting hot coffees up to the top line, and by manipulating smartphones, caused the instant accident. Defendant D has a duty to compensate for damages arising therefrom. Defendant D is liable to compensate for damages arising therefrom, because it was erroneous in failing to properly supervise Defendant E so as not to cause the foregoing accident as an employer to Defendant E, and Defendant Child-Care Safety Mutual Aid Association is liable to compensate for damages arising to the Plaintiffs according to a mutual aid agreement concluded with Defendant D.

C. Determination of the Defendants’ limitation of liability is 1.