logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 논산지원 2014.09.12 2014고정101
의료기기법위반
Text

1. The defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won;

2. If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who operates a medical device sales agency in the name of "C" in the mountain mountain area B.

No one shall put any indication on an outer package, packing material, or an accompanying document of any appliance other than a medical device, that is likely to mislead any person to believe that the appliance has a performance, efficacy, or effect similar to that of the medical device, or make any advertisement with such misleading content.

Nevertheless, on March 7, 2014, the Defendant distributed to many and unspecified persons an advertising site, on which the Defendant indicated that his anti-abruptive motive applied to Plati or ton has the efficacy, such as “discharge of toxins, the promotion of the new Ambassador, and the improvement of the blood cycle.”

As a result, the Defendant advertised that the anti-recrimination applied to the above Plati or ton had the performance, efficacy, and effect similar to the medical device.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Written statements of D;

1. Application of each Act and subordinate statute to a written accusation, a written request for inspection, an advertising electric complex, and a copy of a business registration certificate;

1. Relevant provisions of relevant Acts concerning criminal facts, and Articles 52 (1) 1 and 26 (7) of the Medical Devices Act that choose a penalty;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;

arrow