All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

The costs of the trial shall be borne by the defendants.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is that Defendant B did not use the name of the broker A in mediating the sale and purchase contract of the instant real estate, and there was no explanation to H as to the instant real estate, which is an object of brokerage, and Defendant C explained to H accurately the current status of the instant real estate.

Nevertheless, the lower court found all of the charges of this case guilty, and the lower court erred by misapprehending the facts, thereby adversely affecting the conclusion of the judgment.

2. In full view of the following facts: (a) the Defendants led to the confession of all the facts charged of this case at the lower court; (b) there are sufficient reinforcement evidence, including the police testimony of H and I lawfully examined and adopted by the lower court; and (c) there are no new circumstances to reverse the Defendants’ confession in the trial; (b) the witness I’s statement at the trial, which appears consistent with the Defendant B’s assertion, is inconsistent with the other witnesses’ statements; and (c) it is difficult to believe that the lower court’s conviction of all the facts charged of this case is justifiable, and thus, the Defendants’ assertion is without merit.

3. As such, the Defendants’ appeal is without merit and all of the appeals are dismissed pursuant to Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition by applying Articles 191(1) and 190(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act to the burden of litigation costs at the trial.