Text
Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months.
However, from the date of the conclusion of the judgment, each of the above two years against the Defendants.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
The Defendants conspired to steals, with the knowledge that the store located in Seongbuk-gu, Seongbuk-gu, Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si, the Defendants kept the clothing, such as crowdfunding in the stairs and underground parking lots due to the shortage of warehouses.
1. The Defendants jointly and severally prepared 63 clothes, such as the four-three-three-three-three-three-three-three-three-three-three-three-three-three-three-three-three-three-three-three-three-three-three-three-three-three-three-three-three-three-three-three-three-three-three-three-three-three-three-three-three-three-three-three-three-three-three-three-three-three-three-three-three-three-three-three-three-three-three-three-three-three-three-three-three-three-three-three-three-three-three-one-one, one who is loaded on the Defendant’s vehicle.
2. On December 9, 2013, the Defendants combined with D branch office around 21:00, and Defendant B parked the vehicle on D1st floor, and Defendant A waited for the vehicle in advance. Defendant A prepared 77 clothing 24,187,000 won in total of the market price occupied by the victim F, who was up on the D4th floor and was in custody of the stairs, and stolen Defendant B’s vehicle loaded it together with Defendant B’s vehicle.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendants’ respective legal statements
1. Each police interrogation protocol against the Defendants
1. Each police statement to G, F, and E;
1. Police seizure records;
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to thiefs, field photographs, output copies of closures, specifications of damaged articles, photographs at the seizure site, and photographs of seized articles;
1. Defendants of relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts: Article 331(2) and (1) of the Criminal Act
1. Defendants from among concurrent crimes: the former part of Article 37, Articles 38(1)2 and 50 of the Criminal Act
1. Defendants subject to discretionary mitigation: Articles 53 and 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act
1. Defendants on probation: Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act
1. Defendants of the community service order: Although the total market price of the clothes that the Defendants stolen with the reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act was small, the Defendants were committed at the time of committing the crime, and the Defendants were repented.