logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.05.09 2015고정4871
협박
Text

The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Around March 5, 2015, the Defendant: (a) reported the Defendant’s home computer located in Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government apartment G 108 Dong 603, on the contents of the Kakakao Stockholm dialogue sent and received by the said E; and (b) knew that the said E was in in in an inhuman relationship with the victim.

피고인은 2015. 3. 5. 20:19 경 피해자의 휴대전화에 “ 모든 카 톡 내용 대리점에 배포하겠음.” 이라는 문자를 전송하고, 2015. 3. 10. 18:18 경 피해자의 휴대전화에 “ 니 가족들 주소, 핸 폰 번 다 확보해 놨다.

From December 12, 198, both Stockholm dialogues are being seriously considered to be sent to them by this Melel or mail.

It is necessary to transmit the word “” and to take into account the fact that “Ashes parents and Nshena directly talks with Nshena,” around 05:44 March 11, 2015.

By transmitting the word “,” the victim and the Defendant’s wife notified the victim’s family members and their neighbors of the fact that the victim’s wife E is in in inhuman relationship, and expressed the attitude that the victim would distribute the Kakao Stockholm conversation to the victim’s family members and their neighbors.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Complaint (F);

1. Details of text;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes to Stockholm data (E and between the damage and the damage);

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 283 (1) and (2) of the Criminal Act for the selection of punishment for the crime (generally, selection of fines);

1. A fine not exceeding 500,000 won to be suspended;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act (one-day calculation amount: one hundred thousand won);

1. Determination as to the assertion by the Defendant and the defense counsel under Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., Article 59(1) of the suspended sentence of sentence (see, e., Supreme Court Decision 2006Da15488, Apr. 2, 2006).

arrow