logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2017.06.16 2016누60616
정보공개거부처분취소
Text

1. The part concerning “interpellation” in the judgment of the court of first instance is revoked, and the plaintiff’s claim corresponding to the revoked part is filed.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance concerning this case is that Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act are cited as it is, in addition to the modification of the part of the part of the first instance court Nos. 3, 7 through 4, 3, 3, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 5, 1, 1, 2,

2. On the other hand, on the other hand, information about a false oral detection test should be examined as to the investigation, as it is likely that the methods of the false oral detection test may be exposed if disclosed, so that the inspectors may engage in intentional distortions to interfere with and avoid the inspection. In determining whether to disclose such information, such concern shall be examined.

2) As to the instant case, in full view of the following circumstances, the court’s perusal and examination of the instant information by non-disclosure, and the following circumstances, etc., it is reasonable to recognize that the disclosure of the “interpellation” among the instant information constitutes information subject to non-disclosure under Article 9(1)4 of the Information Disclosure Act, and thus, it is difficult to deem that the “inspection report and the written decision on inspection” among the instant information constitutes information subject to non-disclosure (the Defendant’s assertion includes the purport that the “inspection report and the written decision on inspection” constituted information subject to non-disclosure under Article 9(1)5 of the Information Disclosure Act, even if the aforementioned “examination report and the written decision on inspection” were included in the Defendant’

In the instant information, the term “interpellation” among the information of this case refers to the following: (a) the “interpellation” refers to a document stating specific questions prepared for the inspection of the inspection items requested to the inspector during the individual inspection process; and (b) the disclosure of the information to the public is a pattern or method of the inquiry technology for the inspection of the detection of false horses.

arrow