A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal power] On August 9, 2006, the Defendant issued a summary order of KRW 1.5 million for a fine of KRW 1.5 million for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) at the Daejeon District Court's Daejeon District Court's official branch on December 13, 2006, and a fine of KRW 2 million for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) at the Daejeon District Court's official branch on December 13, 2006, and on August 17, 2007, the same court was sentenced to a fine of KRW 4 million for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving). On December 11, 2009, the Defendant issued a summary order of KRW 3 million for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) at the same court.

【Criminal Facts】

1. Around 00:30 on April 28, 2019, the Defendant has driven a “public-private partnership tunnel” located in the area of the area of the shot (shot (shot) of the public-private partnership on the ground that the Defendant driven a motor vehicle B with the blood alcohol concentration of 0.186% under the influence of alcohol level at the 0.186% from the surface of the area of the shot (shot (shot) of the public-private partnership.

At the time of the entrance of the public-private partnership tunnel, it was installed as a cost of separation from the center of the chemical type. In this case, a person engaged in driving a motor vehicle has a duty of care to prevent the occurrence of the accident in advance by safely driving the motor vehicle, such as a person who is engaged in driving the motor vehicle well, operating the steering gear accurately, complying with the steering gear, etc.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected this and caused the defendant to fall off on the opposite road due to the negligence of leaving the vehicle line by obtaining the central separation zone from the passenger car of the defendant and being planted in the central separation zone.

Accordingly, the Defendant, as seen above, did not take any measures despite the occurrence of risks and obstacles to road traffic, and escaped from the site.

2. Violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) provides that the Defendant is under the influence of alcohol at a section of about 6 km from the public parking lot in front of the Defendant’s dwelling place to the public parking lot in front of the Defendant’s dwelling place at the time of temporary border as set forth in paragraph (1) of the same Article to re-undertake about 0.186% of alcohol concentration from the public parking lot in front of the Defendant’s dwelling place