logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 밀양지원 2017.09.21 2017고단350
전자금융거래법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

No person shall borrow or lend any medium access to electronic financial transactions while demanding or promising the payment therefor.

Nevertheless, on February 14, 2017, the Defendant agreed to receive 10% of the transaction amount traded through the account in return for lending the account at around Gyeongnam-gun, and lent the physical card linked to the Defendant’s husband C’s her husband’s her husband’s post office account (D) by using the Ototoba-house loan to the name in the name of the accused.

As a result, the Defendant promised to pay the price and lent the check card, which is a medium of access to electronic financial transactions.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes concerning a mobile phone closure message;

1. Article 49 of the Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense, Article 49 of the Act on Electronic Financial Transactions through which punishment is selected, and Article 6 (3) 2 of the same Act, and Article 6 (3) 2 of the same Act, and selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. In light of the fact that there is no record of punishment for the same crime as the sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Provisional Payment Order, and the sentencing conditions indicated in the records, such as the defendant’s age, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, etc., the punishment is determined as ordered.

arrow