beta
Text
1. The claim of this case is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The Plaintiff is a business operator engaged in agriculture, water, wholesale and retail and distribution of livestock products, and the Defendant is a business operator who manufactures and sells feed of agricultural and fishery machinery, feed of livestock products, yeast yeast yeast yeast yeast yeast y
B. On July 26, 2012, through Nonparty C and D, the Plaintiff purchased c2,00,000 c., from the Defendant (E; hereinafter “instant machinery”), but thereafter, requested the said D to terminate the contract on the grounds that the agricultural and fishery products garbage, such as the initial sampling, was not well-dried, and D made payment to the Plaintiff on October 29, 2012, around October 29, 2012, with a letter “to cancel the installment contract concluded between the Plaintiff and the Samsung Card Co., Ltd. for the payment of the said price.”
C. However, the Defendant filed a lawsuit against the Plaintiff for the confirmation of the existence of a sales contract by this court 2012Kadan17488 on the ground that it is not an employee of the Defendant, for the following reasons: (a) the Defendant did not have any defect in the entry into force building; (b) and (c) the Defendant filed a lawsuit against the Defendant for the confirmation of the existence of a sales contract on the ground of each written statement prepared in its name; and (d) the Plaintiff asserted against the Defendant for the termination of a sales contract due to a defect of machinery, and filed a counterclaim against the Defendant for the payment of the amount of KRW 32 million and the amount of money calculated at the rate of 20% per annum from June 29, 2013 to the date of full payment.
On September 30, 2013, the Plaintiff and the Defendant concluded the following adjustments in the principal lawsuit and counterclaim:
(hereinafter) On October 31, 2013, the Defendant (Counterclaim) obtained the delivery of the instant machinery (name: Effectuation, size: E) from Nonparty D until October 31, 2013, and conducted a drying test under the following conditions.
The instant machinery is replaced by the Switzerland product at the expense of the Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff).
(b) Building hours;