Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On July 25, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to one year of imprisonment for a crime of fraud, etc. at the District Court, which became final and conclusive on August 2, 2013. On March 30, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to one year of imprisonment for a crime of fraud at the District Court of Jung-gu District on March 30, 2015, and the above sentence became final and conclusive on June 17, 2015.

The defendant is a person who works as a mobile phone agent in the Gu Council-si C as an employee of D.

In collusion with E, F, G, and nameless telemarkets, the Defendant opened a mobile phone under the name of a person who has no intent to pay mobile phone charges and equipment, and sold it to overseas and one-person “largephones” service providers, and solicited the telecommunications company that opened the mobile phone to inflict considerable damage on the amount of unpaid equipment charges.

On October 11, 2010, the Defendant sold a mobile phone to H, a business owner in the above-mentioned D, “A mobile phone operated by his father-friendly Gu, against the driver of I proxy driving company operated by his father-friendly Gu.”

However, as customers are likely to directly visit, the application form was written and opened mobile phone was delivered to the customers as Kwikset service.

However, the defendant knew that the above list's customer is not a person who intends to pay the mobile phone charges and equipment normally, and even if he received a short term from H, he did not think that he would normally deliver it to the nominal owner.

On the same day, the Defendant received a copy of the personal information and resident registration of the J collected by E through the off-name tele-marketing business entity and G in succession, and prepared an application for opening of a mobile phone in the name of J. The Defendant, who is aware of the above circumstances, had the victim, who was a superior agent in charge of opening the mobile phone of the LG Plus Co., Ltd., and had the victim under his/her intention to pay his/her mobile phone fees and equipment to the victim through the employees. The same day is the same.