The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. In light of the gist of the grounds for appeal: (a) the confession and reflect of the defendant; (b) the victim does not want punishment by mutual consent with the victims; (c) the defendant voluntarily surrenders to the police; and (d) the defendant does not have the same criminal record, the punishment (eight months of imprisonment) sentenced by the court below is too unreasonable.

2. Taking into account the circumstances alleged by the Defendant, each of the instant crimes was committed by deceiving KRW 101,01,00 from January 3, 2014 to February 7, 2014, and embezzled as gambling funds while being transferred a total of KRW 101,015,00 from students for studying abroad, and kept for the victim corporation D, and used it as gambling funds. From August 1, 2013 to February 5, 2014, the terms and conditions of the instant crime were 268,210,00 won in total and habitually 61 times until February 5, 2014, the lower court determined that the instant crime was committed by deceiving KRW 5,00 from the victim H, and that the instant case was not easy, and that the victim’s amount and amount of damage caused by the embezzlement and the Defendant’s act of acquiring the environment of the victim, and that the Defendant’s allegation that the Defendant had been sentenced to suspended execution of KRW 361,200,00.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.