logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 평택지원 2015.06.26 2015고단742
특수공무집행방해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On August 5, 2013, the Defendant was issued an order to summary a fine of KRW 1.5 million by a fine of KRW 1.5 million at the site of Suwon District Court as a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (driving) at the site of Pyeongtaek District Court, and on September 5, 2014 by the same court as the same crime, respectively.

Although the Defendant had had a alcohol driving twice as above, on May 14, 2015, the Defendant driven a CS5 car under the influence of alcohol with approximately 13 kilometers in the section of about 0.06% of the blood alcohol concentration from the road near the restaurant of the “marb farm site” located in the Gyeyang-si in Ansan-si to the road located in the 395-ro, Y-si, Yan-si.

Accordingly, the Defendant, even though he was a person driving at least twice, was driving a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol again.

2. On May 14, 2015, the Defendant: (a) operated a bus stop near the bus stop located in the SM5 vehicle located in the Ansan-si, Ansan-si; (b) while under the influence of alcohol, under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant was required to stop from a slope E and policeman, who is a police officer belonging to the D Zone D District of the Ansan-gu Police Station D District, which was under the influence of alcohol, while driving the said IM5 vehicle, but was unlikely to detect the alcohol driving.

At around 23:30 on the same day, the Defendant: (a) committed assault against the police officers on the roads located in 395, SM5, Sung-gu, Sung-gu, Sung-gu, Sung-gu, Sung-gu, Sung-gu, the police officers, recognizing that the said patrol vehicles would be able to receive the said patrol vehicles in order to avoid crackdown control even though they got at a speed while driving the said vehicles, while recognizing that the said patrol vehicles would be able to stop the Defendant’s vehicle while driving the said vehicles, without reducing the speed, while driving the said vehicles at a speed. (b) The Defendant assaulted the said police officers on the right side of the said SM5 vehicles, which are dangerous goods.

arrow