1. The Defendant’s succeeding intervenor included KRW 9,079,616 in the Plaintiff and 5% per annum from July 11, 2013 to August 8, 2016.

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. In fact 1) B around July 11, 2013, 2013, around 15:30, 2013, the passenger car C in the road near the subway station located in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (hereinafter “Defendant car”).

) E Passenger cars driven by D while driving (hereinafter referred to as “Plaintiff car”).

2) The instant accident was concealed (hereinafter referred to as “instant accident”).

(2) At the time of the instant accident, the Plaintiff was on board the Plaintiff’s passenger car chief at the time of the instant accident, and was suffering from the injury of the light salt.

3) The Defendant’s succeeding intervenor is an insurer who has concluded a comprehensive automobile insurance with respect to the Defendant’s automobile. The fact that there is no dispute over grounds for recognition, and the purport of the entire

B. According to the fact of recognition of liability, the Defendant’s succeeding intervenor is liable to compensate the Plaintiff for the damages caused by the instant accident as the insurer of the Defendant’s automobile.

2. Except as otherwise stated below within the scope of liability for damages, each corresponding item of the attached Table of Calculation of Compensation Amount.

In principle, the period for the convenience of the calculation shall be calculated on a monthly basis, but the period of less than the last month and less than KRW 1 shall be discarded.

The calculation of the current value at the time of the accident shall be based on the reduction rate of 5/12 percent per month to deduct the interim interest.

In addition, it is rejected that the parties' arguments are not stated separately.

In daily income: Personal information of KRW 7,079,616 (1): as stated in the “basic matters” list of the amount of damages calculated. 2) The Plaintiff was working as an insurance solicitor at the time of the instant accident at the time of the instant accident.

In the case of a free vocational income earner, such as an insurance solicitor, if the total amount of income is not the net income, but there is no objective data to recognize the necessary expenses to be deducted from the total amount of income, the net income can be calculated by multiplying the standard expense rate by the total amount of income.

The plaintiff in 2012.