1. The Defendant’s KRW 289,59,324 to the Plaintiff, as well as KRW 5% per annum from October 16, 2013 to August 31, 2016.

1. The following facts can be acknowledged in full view of the following facts: there is no dispute between the parties; there is evidence No. 1-1 and No. 2; and the purport of the entire pleadings as a result of a physical examination commissioned by the President of the Korean Intellectual Property and Medical Center of this Court;

1) On October 12, 1997, the Plaintiff (B) was employed as a daily part for the State-owned seed gathering business executed by the Chuncheon State Forest Administration Office under the Defendant’s control and received daily allowances. On October 16, 1997, the Plaintiff (B) was employed as a daily part for the business of collecting state-owned seed seeds, together with C, etc. employed as a daily part of the same as a state-owned forest, the State-owned forest, in the Gyeongyang-gun, U.S., U.S., Gyeongyang-gun, U. 1-1, U.S., the 10m high-speed 10m high-speed tree from the west-style 10m high-speed mar-level tree, which was put into the big-level seed gathering business at a height of up to 7m from the upper-level tree to the upper-level 10m high-level mar. (hereinafter “instant accident”).

2) 2) As the D team leader of the Chuncheon State Forest Administration, E, a public official in charge of collecting the said seeds, merely made it reasonable that the Plaintiff et al. would not put the Plaintiff et al. into a high place while giving work instructions, and did not provide or keep protective facilities such as safety belts, safety caps, safety shoes, etc. to prevent fall, and protective facilities such as safety nets against fall accidents, and emergency medical supplies, etc.

B. On April 15, 200, the Plaintiff filed a lawsuit against the Defendant on April 15, 200 against the Daegu District Court 200Kadan2382, which sought damages from the instant accident, and partly won the judgment. The Plaintiff and the Defendant filed an appeal under the Daegu High Court 2001Na8180, which are dissatisfied with the said judgment of the first instance, and the said appellate court rendered a partial winning judgment that cited the Plaintiff’s claim.

Accordingly, the plaintiff filed an appeal in Supreme Court Decision 2002Da38064.