logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2019.06.07 2019고단1042
공무집행방해
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Criminal facts

피고인은 2019. 4. 7. 02:00경 서울 송파구 B 앞 노상에서 술에 취해 소란을 피워 119 구급대원 및 피고인의 가족들조차 피고인을 제지하지 못하던 중, 119 구급대원의 112 신고를 받고 현장에 출동한 서울송파경찰서 C지구대 소속 순경 D로부터 제지를 받자 “댁이 뭔데 씨발”이라는 등 욕설을 하면서 갑자기 위 D의 왼쪽 관자놀이 부분을 오른 주먹으로 1회 때려 폭행하였다.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of 112 reported cases and protective measures by police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. A E-document;

1. 112 Return disposal slips;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a criminal investigation report, a criminal investigation report (video data on fire fighting), and a criminal investigation report (explosives of video images taken by 119 first responders);

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, which prevents the defendant from performing his/her duties by assaulting a victimized police officer in the course of performing his/her duties, and the liability for such crime is not somewhat minor.

However, the fact that the defendant is recognized as committing the crime of this case and there was no past record of criminal punishment exceeding the fine, and the fact that there was no record of punishment for obstruction of performance of official duties, etc. are considered as favorable to the defendant.

In addition, the defendant's age, character and conduct, degree of assault used, motive and circumstance of the crime, means and consequence of the crime, various sentencing factors specified in the records and arguments of this case, such as the circumstances after the crime, shall be determined as the order.

arrow