beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Criminal facts
1. No person shall publicize similar acts of providing property or property benefits to persons, other than the Seoul Olympic Sports Promotion Foundation or an entrusted business entity, who issued sports betting tickets or similar things and predicted the results thereof, or act as a broker or intermediary for the purchase of sports betting tickets or similar things;
Nevertheless, from May 15, 2014 to June 2, 2015, the Defendant introduced the above gambling site to four members, including friendly E, F, G, and H, as an “agency,” which recruits members of C’s Internet illegal gambling site (D) from around May 15, 2014 to around June 2, 2015, and requested E, etc. to join the said gambling site, and deposited money in the deposit passbook publicly announced on the said website, and then deposited the money into the said website, and then deposited the money from 5,000 to 50,000 won in accordance with the expected dividend rate of each sports event, such as a stable and camping district, so that the Defendant may receive the dividend according to the result. As described in attached Table 1, the Defendant received KRW 9,592,00 from C, etc. under the name of shot (part of the shot amount that lost its members’ s winning).
The Defendant promoted the similar act as above.
2. No one shall gambling by using any similar act;
Nevertheless, on April 9, 2014, the Defendant had access to the above illegal gambling site (D, etc.) and transferred KRW 30,000 to the company bank account in I (J) and received corresponding cyber money.
Then, in accordance with the expected dividend rate of sports events, such as the following axiss and camping districts, gambling was conducted by means of receiving dividends.
In addition, from around that time to April 26, 2015, the Defendant remitted 1,230,000 won in total over 48 times, as shown in attached Table 2 (2) from around that time, and used the similar act as above.
Summary of Evidence
1. The defendant;