1. On June 7, 2016, the Defendant’s disposition of partial payment of temporary layoff benefits against the Plaintiff shall be revoked.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. With respect to an occupational accident that occurred on March 19, 2016, the Plaintiff obtained medical care approval from the Defendant as an injury to the “satise satise satise satise satise satise satise s

B. On June 2, 2016, when the Plaintiff was under medical care, the Plaintiff filed a claim for temporary layoff benefits against the Defendant from May 1, 2016 to June 2, 2016, and the Defendant deemed that the status of employment treatment is possible, and thus, on June 7, 2016, the Defendant claimed temporary layoff benefits against the Defendant.

5. 23. 2. 2. Recognizing only temporary layoff benefits, and temporary layoff benefits for the remainder of the period shall not be recognized;

"A disposition of temporary disability compensation benefits (hereinafter referred to as "disposition of this case")" with the content of the disposition of this case.

(C) The Plaintiff filed a petition for review against the instant disposition, but was dismissed. 【The Plaintiff did not have any dispute over the grounds for recognition, Gap evidence No. 2, Eul evidence No. 1, and the purport of the entire pleadings.

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. 1) The Plaintiff received each unit’s scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic

3) On April 3, 2017, the Plaintiff was subject to a test of medical history at Bolaa Hospital in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, and the maximum corrective eyesight was measured by 1.2 on the right side and 0.02 on the left side, respectively, and was diagnosed to be in a state in which the eyesight cannot be corrected due to the direction of the correction in the case of the left eye. 4) The appraisal of Samsung Seoul Hospital’s department entrusted with the examination of medical records by this court was presented as follows.

Each organ transplant surgery is the most severe surgery during the surgery conducted by an internal department, and in the case of an organ transplant surgery due to an sacrificing of trauma disorder, it is sacratic and limited to recover of eyesight after the surgery.

The plaintiff is required to do so two times before he undergoes a transplant surgery.