A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to eight months and a fine of up to five million won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine.

Punishment of the crime

No one shall commit any act of arranging sexual traffic, etc.

From September 3, 2014 to September 24, 2014, the Defendant operated a commercial sex acts in the Seoul Special Metropolitan City Gwangjin-gu and the second floor, where five employees D and female employees E are engaged in the act of similarity, the size of 24 square meters, namely, “F” in the size of 24 square meters. On September 24, 2014, the Defendant received 40,000 won from G from the male grandchildren at the same place, and paid 25,000 won among them to the female employees E, and caused E to engage in a similar act by neglecting the sexual organ of G and causing them to be aware of the situation.

Accordingly, the defendant committed acts of arranging sexual traffic for business purposes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police interrogation protocol against the accused;

1. Investigation report (report attached to the same indictment as a suspect A);

1. Records of seizure and the list of seizure;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs at enforcement sites;

1. Relevant Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, Etc., choice of imprisonment and the concurrent imposition of fines (Article 24 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic);

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Social service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. The former part of Article 25 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, and Articles 48 (1) 1 and 2 of the Criminal Act;

1. The defendant and his defense counsel's assertion on the claim of the defendant and defense counsel under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order. The defendant and defense counsel asserted that the crime of this case in the crime of this case is the crime of this case for which a summary order of KRW 5 million has been issued by the court approximately 2014 high-level 12584, and the crime of this case is a general crime and the crime of this case, and thus the effect of the above summary order is limited to the crime

(2) The name of the same crime.