logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2018.11.08 2018구단69588
난민불인정결정취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The Plaintiff entered the Republic of Korea on February 25, 2016 with the status of stay C-3 (short-term visit) (short-term visit), which is a foreigner of the Republic of Senegal (Roenegal) of the Republic of Senegal (hereinafter “Senegal”).

B. On March 4, 2016, the Plaintiff filed an application for refugee status with the Defendant, but on November 9, 2017, the Defendant rendered a disposition for refugee status refusal (hereinafter “instant disposition”) to the Plaintiff on the ground that it is difficult to recognize “the well-founded fear that there is a possibility of persecution” as stipulated in Article 1 of the Convention on the Status of Refugees (hereinafter “Refugee Convention”) and Article 1 of the Protocol on the Status of Refugees (hereinafter “Refugee Protocol”) and Article 1 of the Protocol on the Status of Refugees (hereinafter “Refugee Protocol”).

C. On December 1, 2017, the Plaintiff filed an objection with the Minister of Justice against the instant disposition. However, the Minister of Justice dismissed the Plaintiff’s objection on the same ground as on June 12, 2018.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1 to 4, Eul evidence 1 to 3, and the purport of whole pleadings

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion was originally sleeped, but around 2009, the Plaintiff married with his wife, who was the new slicker of the sleep, and entered the church with his wife, and entered the church in around 2015.

Then, the Plaintiff visited the next high direction, and the Plaintiff’s father and punishment did not go through the Islamic teaching method became aware of the Plaintiff’s opening of a religious life, and used serious violence against the Plaintiff on the ground that the Plaintiff’s opening of a religious life was done.

Then, the Plaintiff heard that the Plaintiff would murder the Plaintiff on the ground that the Plaintiff’s her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her

Nevertheless, the plaintiff.

arrow